You are here

The power of politics

Jul 05,2020 - Last updated at Jul 05,2020

While the Israeli government has not officially announced a date, many expected the implementation of Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s plan to annex the West Bank on the July 1, last week. While the unilateral move is likely to provoke diplomatic reactions that may not deter Israel from their plans, there could well be broader diplomatic, economic and security implications. There are some who argue that the official policy of annexation does not change the de facto situation on which any upcoming peace plans will be based on. However, the flipside of that is that the unilateral move created unnecessary animosity towards Israel in the region and globally. 

While the annexation does not technically affect any Jordanian territory, there could be short- and medium-term impacts and logically Jordan must defend its position. His Majesty’s address to retired military personnel last week highlighted Jordan’s support from Arab countries. In particular he pointed to His Royal Highness Sheikh Mohamed Bin Zayed Al Nahyan and the diplomatic efforts of the UAE and its foreign ministry in supporting the Jordanian position, even with the US administration. The Emirati ambassador in Washington wrote an article directed to the Israeli people, and while important, it would have been much more influential if it had been written by the foreign minister of an Arab country that has a peace treaty with Israel.

The diplomatic pressure being put on Israel in the public way that it is, is unlikely to ultimately be effective, as Israel would appear to have folded to diplomatic pressure if they do not proceed with the full annexation. It is more likely they will maintain the policy position and adopt a gradual annexation approach, starting with the larger settlements, and leave the door open for an eventual diplomatic deal, but only after most of the critical areas have been annexed. That way Israel gets what it wants and appears to have been a good international actor by working with making diplomatic compromises. This approach would gain praise from those such as the EU, but even perhaps the US as President Donald Trump begins his re-election campaign, and would be seeking to avoid any escalation or the full collapse of the peace initiative that he has been promoting over the past four years. 

It is critical for Jordan to adopt a dynamic and pragmatic approach to diplomacy, open channels with all parties while at the same time taking into consideration the delicacy of the situation. Jordan could capitalise on the US’ current interests in saving the peace process, while also considering the fragile situation in the region with the worsening economic situation, particularly the West Bank, Syria and Lebanon. Jordan faces serious risks, from the economic situation to risks around underlying critical services like water and energy. It is important for Jordan to adopt a strategy based on providing alternatives and not to put itself in an unwinnable position. The power of a country like Jordan can be merely in making use of its geo-political situation, so the real power for Jordan is the power of politics. 

up
46 users have voted.

Add new comment

CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
10 + 4 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.

Newsletter

Get top stories and blog posts emailed to you each day.