You are here

US’ wrong priorities on terrorism

Jun 25,2015 - Last updated at Jun 25,2015

Were the killings in the church in Charleston terrorism, meant to intimidate the black population of America?

Of course they were. 

Moreover, they were a reflection of the still widespread white hatred for America’s first black president, Barack Obama.

Indeed, as The New York Times editorialised last week, “the main terrorist threat in the US is not from violent Muslim extremists, but from right-wing extremists. (Many of them anti-black.) Just ask the police”.

The New York Times has studied 382 police officers and 74 per cent reported extremism by whites. Severe Muslim extremism was only 3 per cent of the total.

The number of violent plots carried out by international terrorists remains very low and most attempts were disrupted. Last year, not one US citizen at home died from international terrorism.

The number of Americans killed abroad was 24. In contrast, at home, right wing, white extremists, carried out 337 attacks per year in the decade after September 11, causing 254 fatalities.

So much for attacks by Al Qaeda-type terrorists.

Nevertheless, if one looks at it from a worldwide perspective, there was last year an increase in the number of terrorist attacks, jumping by 35 per cent in a single year, but overwhelmingly concentrated in the Middle East, principally in Iraq (the legacy of president George Bush’s and UK prime minister Tony Blair’s invasion), with Syria, Pakistan, Afghanistan, India and Nigeria next.

Al Qaeda affiliates, including the most deadly of all, Daesh, rampant in Syria and Iraq, have become among the world’s foremost purveyors of terrorist violence.

Even so, the number of deaths, 32,727, is about the same as the number killed annually in car accidents in the US.

The misinformation most Americans suffer from, thanks to slanted media and the frenzy of mainly Republican politicians, is extremely worrying, not least because it is pushing Obama back into the sinkhole of Middle Eastern self-destructiveness.

Two beheadings of American citizens in late August and September by Daesh seems to have shifted a war-weary nation that shunned more war to increase the support for US air strikes among those of voting age from 52 per cent to 78 per cent, and for deploying ground troops from 19 per cent to 44 per cent.

As Micah Zencho writes in the US magazine Foreign Policy, “this is unsurprising because people are exposed to threatening television news coverage which is far more likely to support hawkish foreign policies”.

Obama has been pushed by this reporting, Republican pressure, the Pentagon and even some of his White House and State Department staff to expand the bombing of Syria and Daesh, and has deployed hundreds of troops to train the Iraqi army that eight years of occupation could not achieve.

That said, the worsening Middle Eastern trends are only a small fraction of overall violent deaths.

According to the NGO The Geneva Declaration, less than 7 per cent of the world’s violent deaths were the result of terrorism; 93 per cent were interpersonal violence, gang violence and economically motivated crimes.

Citizens of several Central American and Caribbean countries are still more likely to be the victim of homicide than Iraqis or Syrians.

Back to Charleston: America should be focusing on crimes against blacks rather than putting so much of the nation’s energy into tackling Middle East terrorism.

As Obama said the other day: “We as a country will have to reckon with the fact that this type of mass violence does not happen in other advanced countries.”

Black Americans are killed at 12 times the rate of people in other developed countries.

If one compares various countries’ rate of homicides against the Human Development Index, an overall measure of the standard of living and welfare, one gets a picture of who is top in the violence league.

Among the developed countries, the US’ rate of homicide deaths is 5.2 per 100,000 persons, more than three times its neighbour’s, Canada.

France and the UK stand at 1.1, Italy and Sweden at 0.9, Denmark 0.8 and Japan 0.4.

The Arab countries are also well placed in the league. Bahrain and the United Arab Emirates stand at 0.7 and Saudi Arabia at 0.8.

America’s primary concern should be its gun laws, not international terrorism.

Despite mass killings in schools and other places, Obama’s attempts to tighten gun laws have been shot down.

It is not just Republicans in Congress who vote against Obama on this, but Democrats too.

Once the deal on Iran’s nuclear programme is signed, probably in a week’s time, Obama should use an executive order to ban the public wearing of arms, military-type weapons and the buying of guns with no questions asked.

 

This should be America’s priority, not hysterical overstatements about the savagery of international terrorism.

up
39 users have voted.


Newsletter

Get top stories and blog posts emailed to you each day.

PDF