You are here

A matter of survival

Nov 14,2017 - Last updated at Nov 14,2017

Until a few months ago, Daesh seemed invincible. Suddenly, from May to October, it lost most of its territory in Iraq and Syria. Even though its network in Europe is active, it will lose steam in the next few months.

This dramatic turnaround was brought about by a singular military action of the US-led international coalition.

Daesh controlled Tabaqa, the largest dam in Syria on the Euphrates River. It used it to hide its top leaders and high-value prisoners, besides selling electricity from the hydropower station to the Assad regime.

It also had its tax office there for traders from Iraq and Syria to pay ransom. 

Daesh believed that the international coalition would not bomb the dam for the fear of flooding southern Syria.

One night in late March, the US marines helped the Syrian Democratic Forces, comprising mostly the Kurdish armed group YPG, to land at Tabaqa by helicopter. It took six weeks of battle for the Daesh to surrender the dam.

Once it lost its biggest strategic asset, it took a few more weeks to lose most of the territory under its control.

But this has raised new ethical and political questions. The dam is now controlled by YPG, another armed non-state actor. The competition for strategic water assets in the Middle East is now between armed groups and terrorists. This has resulted from the failure of states to cooperate over the last several decades.

There is fear that terrorists will also compete for control over water assets in parts of Africa in the future.

In February, the UN Security Council passed Resolution 2341 calling on UN member states to protect critical infrastructure, including water installations, building on the Security Council session 7818 of November 22, 2016, on water, peace and security.

With growing concern for security threats to water, the Global High Level Panel on Water and Peace has presented a comprehensive plan to protect water infrastructure from terrorist attacks and violent conflicts.

Chaired by Danilo Turk, former president of Slovenia, and co-convened by 15 countries from all continents, the panel released its report on September 14.

The recommendations of the panel also include financial and diplomatic measures to foster trans-boundary water cooperation, since security and cooperation are interdependent.

The efforts for cooperative water security are further strengthened as the Inter Action Council, an organisation of former heads of governments, announced its support for the Water Cooperation Quotient, constructed by the Strategic Foresight Group.

This barometer of cooperation in all of the world’s 286 shared river basins reveals a strong correlation between trans-boundary water cooperation and diminution of the risk of war.

Of the 146 countries with shared rivers and lakes, 22 pairs of countries engaged in war or war rhetoric happen to be the same which score at the bottom of the Water Cooperation Quotient.

Nobel Peace Laureate Jose Ramos Horta urges the world to use it as a conflict prevention tool. 

Africa is leading the way in water cooperation. The countries in Senegal and Gambia river basins own and manage hydro-electric plants, canals and navigation lines as common property, superseding national sovereignty.

The nine countries in the Niger river basin own water assets nationally, but voluntarily offer veto to the neighbours before building infrastructure.

Senegal is taking an initiative to spread the idea of cooperative water security at the UN Security Council. It is also hosting the World Water Forum in 2021 to highlight the linkage between water, peace and security.

Ethiopia, Sudan and Egypt are gradually giving up their confrontational attitude on managing the Nile River. And smaller African countries such as Burkina Faso, Ghana and Cote d’Ivoire are taking baby steps to establish river basin organisations.

Europe and the Americas already have robust river basin organisations. The countries of the Middle East and Asia are most reluctant to cooperate, creating a mega arch of hydro insecurity from the Middle East via Central and South Asia to Southeast Asia.

The risks of war, terrorism and poverty that 2 billion people in shared river basins of the developing world face can be averted in the future if investments are made in cooperative water security.

Therefore, the report of the Global High Level Panel on Water and Peace concluded that water is not merely about development and sanitation, it is a matter of survival.



The writer is president of Strategic Foresight Group, an international think tank. He contributed this article to The Jordan Times.

64 users have voted, including you.

Add new comment

This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
2 + 1 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.


Get top stories and blog posts emailed to you each day.