You are here

Journalism’s risky tech attraction

Mar 23,2019 - Last updated at Mar 23,2019

OXFORD — Technology was supposed to solve some of the world’s biggest problems. Connect everyone to the Internet, it was once assumed, and democracy would follow. Collect enough data, and all of our questions would be answered. Put everything online, and algorithms would do the rest. The world would practically run itself.

Instead, we now know that digital technology can be used to undermine democracy, that it raises more questions than it answers and that a world that runs itself seems more like an Orwellian nightmare scenario than a noble goal. But while technology is not the solution, it is not really the problem either; our single-minded focus on it is.

Consider the experience of the media industry, where the digital revolution has wreaked havoc on prevailing business models over the last decade. Publishers and editors responded by putting all their faith in technology: tracking all manner of metrics, embracing data journalism, hiring video teams and opening podcast studios.

More recently, media organisations have shifted their attention toward artificial-intelligence solutions that track audience preferences, automatically produce desired content and translations, alert journalists to breaking news and much more. In the Reuters Institute for the Study of Journalism’s latest annual report on media trends, 78 per cent of respondents in a non-representative survey of international media leaders said that they planned to invest more in AI this year.

But the final frontier in the quest to save journalism, many believe, is the blockchain, the distributed ledger technology that underpins cryptocurrencies like Bitcoin. That remains to be seen: The first attempt to leverage the blockchain to free journalists from ad-driven business models, by Civil Media Company, had a bumpy start.

There is nothing wrong with using technology to solve problems, including those created by technology, or to give a company a competitive edge. That is what The Washington Post, for example, has been doing in the six years since Amazon CEO Jeff Bezos purchased it, at a time when it was haemorrhaging money and shedding jobs.

But not even the most advanced tech will save the media industry, or anybody else, if there is no regard for the people using it. And that does not mean just audiences. After years of chasing the latest tech trends, the media industry is increasingly confronting burnout among existing management and staff, and a shrinking pool of new talent.

According to the Reuters Institute report, some 60 per cent of media leaders are concerned about burnout on their teams, and 75 per cent now worry about retaining and attracting staff. Another report, Lucy Kueng’s “Going Digital. A Roadmap for Organisational Transformation“, shows that middle managers, in particular, have been exiting the industry.

This should not be surprising. Journalists have always faced pressure in managing the churn of time-sensitive, demanding and constantly changing news situations. But, in the past, they could at least count on the news organisations that employed them to offer stability and consistency. Now, they must also navigate relentless, tech-driven organisational change, often poorly explained and hastily introduced. The level of uncertainty can drive away even the most loyal staff.

To be sure, change is unavoidable; the digital age demands constant adaptation. But making needed adjustments without destroying morale requires implementing a people-oriented approach. This is not a straightforward process. For tech solutions, managers can attend shiny digital conferences, take some sales team’s advice, sign a contract and dump the new tools on their newsrooms. With people, they have to listen carefully, acquire an in-depth understanding of the problem and then devise their own strategy.

A good place to start is leadership. In any industry, the key responsibilities of an organisation’s leaders include making their employees feel secure and appreciated. That means paying attention to employees’ needs and fostering an organisational culture that provides them with a sense of belonging and purpose.

A similar approach must be applied to audiences. Not even the most accurate metrics can provide the needed guidance, if nobody understands what they actually mean, why they were chosen, or what their psychological impact would be, on audiences or staff. While data can deliver useful insights about audience preferences, listening to people can lead to very different impressions and conclusions.

For example, the data might show that more content means more page views; but if audiences long for fewer distractions and higher-quality reporting, flooding the market with robot-produced content will not satisfy them. Likewise, users might click on a larger share of articles if algorithms are used to personalise their experience; but if users become bored by the same topics and perspectives, personalisation will not help.

Tech-based solutions are a means, not an end. That is why The New York Times, for example, is leveraging its digital success to invest more in journalism. Last year, the company added 120 newsroom employees, bringing the total number of journalists there to a historic high of 1,600.

For organisations without the clout, and digital revenue, of the Times, a people-oriented approach may also be needed to secure investment. With the limits of the ad-driven business model becoming increasingly apparent, many media leaders, close to one-third, according to the Reuters Institute survey, believe that in the future foundations and non-profits will play a central role in supporting the media.

But persuading foundations and philanthropists to open their hearts and wallets will require human connection and engagement, not algorithms or AI-enabled software. Potential funders need to be convinced that journalism is as noble a cause as, say, cancer research.

Technology alone cannot encourage democracy, help answer important questions and facilitate effective leadership by boosting accountability. But, to some extent, high-quality, responsible journalism can. If it is to fulfil that purpose, however, news organisations must not allow themselves to be swept up by every new tech trend. If they treat technology as more than a tool for implementing people-centred strategies, the people they need, both staff and audiences, will continue to vote with their feet.

 

Alexandra Borchardt is director of Leadership Programmes at the Reuters Institute for the Study of Journalism. Copyright: Project Syndicate, 2019. www.project-syndicate.org 

up
12 users have voted.

Add new comment

CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
17 + 3 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.